Parotid-Sparing Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Compared With Conventional Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Oropharyngeal or Hypopharyngeal Cancer Who Are at High Risk of Radiation-Induced Xerostomia

RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy delivers thin beams of radiation of different strengths directly to the tumor from many angles. This type of radiation therapy may reduce damage to the parotid (salivary) glands, prevent xerostomia (dry mouth), and improve quality of life. It is not yet known whether...

Date First Received: April 7, 2004

Last Updated: July 23, 2008

Verified by: National Cancer Institute (NCI), March 2008

Clinical Trial Phase: Phase 3 | Start Date: January 2004

Overall Status: Active, not recruiting

Estimated Enrollment: 84

Brief Summary

Official Title: “A Multicentre Randomised Study Of Parotid Sparing Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy In Patients With Head And Neck Cancer”

RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy delivers thin beams of radiation of different strengths directly to the tumor from many angles. This type of radiation therapy may reduce damage to the parotid (salivary) glands, prevent xerostomia (dry mouth), and improve quality of life.

It is not yet known whether intensity-modulated radiation therapy is more effective than conventional radiation therapy in preventing xerostomia and improving quality of life in patients who have throat cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying intensity-modulated radiation therapy to see how well it works compared to conventional radiation therapy in treating patients with oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer who are at risk of developing xerostomia caused by radiation therapy.

Study Type: Interventional

Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Active Control

Study Primary Completion Date: January 2013

Detailed Clinical Trial Description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary - Compare the proportion of patients with oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer with xerostomia of ≥ grade 2 at one year after treatment with parotid-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs conventional radiotherapy.

Secondary - Compare the degree of xerostomia by quantitative measurements of stimulated and unstimulated salivary flow in patients treated with these regimens. - Compare quality of life in patients treated with these regimens. - Compare local and regional tumor control, time to tumor progression, and overall survival of patients treated with these regimens. - Compare acute and late side effects of these regimens in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center and site of disease (oropharynx vs hypopharynx). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. - Arm I: Patients undergo parotid-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy once daily, 5 days a week, for 6 weeks. - Arm II: Patients undergo conventional radiotherapy once daily, 5 days a week, for 6 weeks.

Salivary flow measurements are performed at baseline, at week 4 during radiotherapy, and then at 2 weeks and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the completion of radiotherapy.

Quality of life is assessed at baseline, at 2 weeks, and then at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after the completion of radiotherapy.

Patients are followed monthly for 1 year, every 2 months for 1 year, and then every 6 months for 3 years.

Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 84 patients (42 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study.

Intervention(s) in this Clinical Trial

  • Procedure: management of therapy complications
  • Procedure: radiation therapy

Outcome Measures for this Clinical Trial

Primary Measures

  • Proportion of patients suffering xerostomia ≥ grade 2 by LENT/SOMA late toxicity scale at 1 year
    • Safety Issue?: Yes

Secondary Measures

  • Degree of xerostomia by salivary flow at 1 year
    • Safety Issue?: No
  • Xerosomia-related quality of life by Modified Xerostomia questionnaire at 1 year
    • Safety Issue?: No
  • Quality of Life by EORTC QLQ C30 v.3.0 and QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires at 1 year
    • Safety Issue?: No
  • Local and regional tumor control by a quantitative description of sites of relapse at 1 year
    • Safety Issue?: No
  • Time to tumor progression at 1 year
    • Safety Issue?: No
  • Overall survival at 1 year
    • Safety Issue?: No
  • Acuteside effects of radiotherapy by NCI CTCAE scale v. 3.0 at 1 year
    • Safety Issue?: Yes
  • Late side effects of radiotherapy by NCI CTCAE scale v3.0, LENT SOMA and RTOG at 1 year
    • Safety Issue?: Yes

Criteria for Participation in this Clinical Trial

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer
  • Squamous cell or undifferentiated carcinoma
  • Stage T1-4, N0-3, M0 disease
  • Primary tumor requiring radical radiotherapy with parallel opposed lateral fields and bilateral cervical lymph node irradiation
  • Radiotherapy is either the primary therapy or post-operative (adjuvant irradiation) treatment
  • High-risk for radiation-induced xerostomia with conventional radiotherapy due to irradiation of the majority of both parotid glands* NOTE: *Estimated mean dose to both parotid glands is greater than 24 Gy by conventional radiotherapy
  • No bilateral N3 nodal disease
  • No huge primary tumor (exceeding 10 cm in diameter)
  • No contralateral lymphadenopathy adjacent to or involving contralateral parotid gland making parotid sparing impossible
  • No tumor at the base of the tongue where sparing of contralateral parapharyngeal space is contraindicated

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Age
  • Not specified
  • Performance status
  • WHO 0-1
  • Life expectancy
  • Not specified
  • Hematopoietic
  • Not specified
  • Hepatic
  • Not specified
  • Renal
  • Not specified
  • Other
  • Able to undergo quality of life and salivary flow measurements (dependent on cognitive aptitude and long availability)
  • Able to complete self-assessed quality of life questionnaire
  • No prior or concurrent illness that would preclude study participation
  • No pre-existing salivary gland pathology interfering with saliva production
  • No other prior malignancy except nonmelanoma skin cancer

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • Biologic therapy
  • Not specified
  • Chemotherapy
  • Prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy allowed
  • No concurrent chemotherapy
  • Endocrine therapy
  • Not specified
  • Radiotherapy
  • See Disease Characteristics
  • No prior radiotherapy to the head and neck region
  • No concurrent brachytherapy
  • Surgery
  • See Disease Characteristics
  • Other
  • No concurrent prophylactic amifostine or pilocarpine

Gender Eligibility for this Clinical Trial: Both

Minimum Age for this Clinical Trial: N/A

Maximum Age for this Clinical Trial: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted for this Clinical Trial?: No

Clinical Trial Sponsor Information

Lead Sponsor: Royal Marsden - London

Overall Clinical Trial Officials and Contacts

Chris Nutting Study Chair Royal Marsden - London  

Additional Information

Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on August 08, 2008

Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00081029

Study ID Number: CDR0000358803

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00081029

Health Authority: United States: Federal Government

Clinical trial summary from the National Cancer Institute's PDQ® database

Clinical Trials Authorship and Review

Clinical Trials content is provided directly by the U.S. National Institutes of Health via ClinicalTrials.gov and is not reviewed separately by ClinicalTrialsFeeds.org. Every page of specific clinical trials information contains a unique identifier which can be used to find further details directly from the National Institutes of Health.