This Stage II study is in response to NIDA's Behavioral Therapies Development Program (PA-99-107). A randomized clinical trial is proposed to evaluate the direct, mediated, and moderated effects of Integrated Family and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (IFCBT), a multisystems treatment for adolescent drug abuse with promising efficacy results. In the first study aim, we seek to evaluate the separate...
Date First Received: September 13, 2005
Last Updated: April 6, 2006
Verified by: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, April 2006
Clinical Trial Phase: Phase 2 | Start Date: January 2005
Overall Status: Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment: 200
Brief Summary
Official Title: “Youth Drug Abuse Family and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy”
Condition Keyword(s):
Intervention(s):
This Stage II study is in response to NIDA's Behavioral Therapies Development Program (PA-99-107). A randomized clinical trial is proposed to evaluate the direct, mediated, and moderated effects of Integrated Family and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (IFCBT), a multisystems treatment for adolescent drug abuse with promising efficacy results. In the first study aim, we seek to evaluate the separate and possibly synergistic effects of family systems and cognitive-behavioral IFCBT components on posttreatment drug abuse problem severity, problem behavior, psychiatric distress, and academic achievement of adolescent drug abusers. Innovative analytic strategies are subsequently used to evaluate the degree to which successful outcomes are attributable to specific familial and cognitive-behavioral change processes targeted by IFCBT components. The possibility of effect-modification also is considered, with a focus on neurocognitive, psychiatric comorbidity, and demographic factors.
Namely, we seek to understand how variations in specific client characteristics, such as executive dysfunctions or psychiatric comorbidity, might explain why treatments work for some drug abusing youths but not others. In addition to promising findings on IFCBT efficacy, this Stage II proposal benefits from the development and Stage I study application of (a) treatment manuals; (b) therapist training procedures; (c) therapist adherence and competence tools; (d) a neuropsychological battery to assess cognitive functions; (e) a psychodiagnostic battery to assess comorbid psychiatric disorders; and (f) a study assessment battery comprised of therapeutic process and outcome measures. This revised application has sought to address well-taken concerns cited by the reviewers while maintaining proposal strengths. The lack of adolescent drug treatment research continues to be a serious gap in the addictions literature despite alarmingly high rates of drug abuse among youth and the range of morbidities and mortality that result nationwide. If successful, this project should help to identify specific behavior change processes targeted by family systems and cognitive-behavioral treatments that foster subsequent reductions in drug use and problem behavior among recovering youth. Neurocognitive and psychiatric influences on adolescent drug treatment outcomes appear to be significant yet are poorly understood. Increasing our understanding of relationships between client characteristics, skill development during treatments, and subsequent outcomes should also help to improve adolescent drug treatments.
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Dose Comparison, Factorial Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Detailed Clinical Trial Description
This Stage II study is in response to NIDA's Behavioral Therapies Development Program (PA-99-107). A randomized clinical trial is proposed to evaluate the direct, mediated, and moderated effects of Integrated Family and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (IFCBT), a multisystems treatment for adolescent drug abuse with promising efficacy results. In the first study aim, we seek to evaluate the separate and possibly synergistic effects of family systems and cognitive-behavioral IFCBT components on posttreatment drug abuse problem severity, problem behavior, psychiatric distress, and academic achievement of adolescent drug abusers. Innovative analytic strategies are subsequently used to evaluate the degree to which successful outcomes are attributable to specific familial and cognitive-behavioral change processes targeted by IFCBT components. The possibility of effect-modification also is considered, with a focus on neurocognitive, psychiatric comorbidity, and demographic factors.
Namely, we seek to understand how variations in specific client characteristics, such as executive dysfunctions or psychiatric comorbidity, might explain why treatments work for some drug abusing youths but not others. In addition to promising findings on IFCBT efficacy, this Stage II proposal benefits from the development and Stage I study application of (a) treatment manuals; (b) therapist training procedures; (c) therapist adherence and competence tools; (d) a neuropsychological battery to assess cognitive functions; (e) a psychodiagnostic battery to assess comorbid psychiatric disorders; and (f) a study assessment battery comprised of therapeutic process and outcome measures. This revised application has sought to address well-taken concerns cited by the reviewers while maintaining proposal strengths. The lack of adolescent drug treatment research continues to be a serious gap in the addictions literature despite alarmingly high rates of drug abuse among youth and the range of morbidities and mortality that result nationwide. If successful, this project should help to identify specific behavior change processes targeted by family systems and cognitive-behavioral treatments that foster subsequent reductions in drug use and problem behavior among recovering youth. Neurocognitive and psychiatric influences on adolescent drug treatment outcomes appear to be significant yet are poorly understood. Increasing our understanding of relationships between client characteristics, skill development during treatments, and subsequent outcomes should also help to improve adolescent drug treatments.
Intervention(s) in this Clinical Trial
- Behavioral: Integrated Family and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy
Outcome Measures for this Clinical Trial
Primary Measures
- Alcohol use abstinence and frequency
- Marijuana use abstinence and frequency
- Other drug use abstinence and frequency
Secondary Measures
- Legal involvement
- Family functioning
- Problem solving skill
- Rational Beliefs
- Learning Strategy Skill
- Academic Achievement
Criteria for Participation in this Clinical Trial
- Inclusion Criteria: Adolescents and young adults aged 13 to 21 years old who have significant drug-related problems or meet diagnostic criteria for drug abuse/dependence. -
- Exclusion Criteria: Acute psychotic, suicidal, homicidal ideation. Problem severity requiring residential treatment. -
Gender Eligibility for this Clinical Trial: Both
Minimum Age for this Clinical Trial: 13 Years
Maximum Age for this Clinical Trial: 21 Years
Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted for this Clinical Trial?: No
Clinical Trial Sponsor Information
Lead Sponsor: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Overall Clinical Trial Officials and Contacts
William W. Latimer, Ph.D., M.P.H. Principal Investigator Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Related Publications
Citations Reporting Results
Latimer WW, Winters KC, D'Zurilla T, Nichols M. Integrated family and cognitive-behavioral therapy for adolescent substance abusers: a stage I efficacy study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003 Sep 10;71(3):303-17.
Latimer WW, Stone AL, Voight A, Winters KC, August GJ. Gender differences in psychiatric comorbidity among adolescents with substance use disorders. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002 Aug;10(3):310-5.
Additional Information
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on December 03, 2008
Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00198874
Study ID Number: 5R01DA010777-08
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00198874
Health Authority: United States: Institutional Review Board
Clinical Trials Authorship and Review
Clinical Trials content is provided directly by the U.S. National Institutes of Health via ClinicalTrials.gov and is not reviewed separately by ClinicalTrialsFeeds.org. Every page of specific clinical trials information contains a unique identifier which can be used to find further details directly from the National Institutes of Health.