Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of combined intraocular injection of gentamycin and clindamycin in prevention of acute posttraumatic bacterial endophthalmitis (APBE) following penetrating eye injuries. Design: Multicenter, randomized, double masked, controlled trial. Participants: Three hundred forty six eyes of 346 patients with penetrating eye injury. Method: Following primary repair, eyes...
Date First Received: November 13, 2006
Last Updated: November 13, 2006
Verified by: Shaheed Beheshti Medical University, November 2006
Clinical Trial Phase: Phase 4 | Start Date: March 2002
Overall Status: Completed
Brief Summary
Condition Keyword(s):
Intervention(s):
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of combined intraocular injection of gentamycin and clindamycin in prevention of acute posttraumatic bacterial endophthalmitis (APBE) following penetrating eye injuries.
Design: Multicenter, randomized, double masked, controlled trial. Participants: Three hundred forty six eyes of 346 patients with penetrating eye injury.
Method: Following primary repair, eyes were randomized to receive a 0.1 ml intracameral or intravitreal injection of 40µg gentamycin and 45µg clindamycin (cases), versus intracameral or intravitreal injection of 0.1ml balanced saline solution (controls). All patients received standard prophylactic antibiotic therapy (systemic, subconjunctival and topical).
Main outcome measures: Occurrence of endophthalmitis within two weeks after primary repair.
Results: The overall incidence of acute posttraumatic bacterial endophthalmitis was 2.6% (9 eyes). Endophthalmitis occurred in 8 of 167 eyes in the control group (2.3%) and only in one of 179 eyes in the case group (0.3%) [p<0.04] . Odds ratio of developing endophthalmitis was 8.93 times higher in controls (95% CI, 1.11-71.43). Retained intraocular foreign body (IOFB) was present in 52 eyes (including 25 and 27 eyes in controls and cases respectively).
Endophthalmitis developed in 7 of 52 eyes (13%) with retained IOFB and in 2 of 294 eyes (0.6%) without an IOFB (p<0.039). Vitreous culture was positive in 6 of 9 eyes (66.6%) with endophthalmitis; the most common isolated microorganism was Staphylococcus epidermis.
Conclusion: Intraocular injection of gentamycin and clindamycin in addition to other methods of prophylaxis is effective in prevention of acute posttraumatic bacterial endophthalmitis even in high-risk cases such as those with retained IOFB. These antibiotics have a major role as adjuncts to primary repair of eyes with penetrating injury without significant side effects at the dosage used.
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention(s) in this Clinical Trial
- Drug: gentamycin and clindamycin
Criteria for Participation in this Clinical Trial
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients with penetrating eye injuries referred to collaborating institutes for primary repair
Exclusion Criteria:
- Absence of light perception
- presence of endophthalmitis at the time of initial evaluation
- total corneal opacity
- age under 3 years
- severe intracameral hemorrhage
- history of intraocular surgery and presence of a corneal ulcer
- Monocular patients
- the better eye in simultaneous bilateral injuries
Gender Eligibility for this Clinical Trial: Both
Minimum Age for this Clinical Trial: 3 Years
Maximum Age for this Clinical Trial: N/A
Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted for this Clinical Trial?: No
Clinical Trial Sponsor Information
Lead Sponsor: Shaheed Beheshti Medical University
Overall Clinical Trial Officials and Contacts
Masoud Soheilian, MD Principal Investigator Ophthalmic Research Center of Shaheed Beheshti Medical University
Additional Information
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on August 29, 2008
Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00398658
Study ID Number: 8019
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00398658
Health Authority: Iran: Ethics Committee
Clinical Trials Authorship and Review
Clinical Trials content is provided directly by the U.S. National Institutes of Health via ClinicalTrials.gov and is not reviewed separately by ClinicalTrialsFeeds.org. Every page of specific clinical trials information contains a unique identifier which can be used to find further details directly from the National Institutes of Health.