A double-blind clinical trial investigating if a sub-group of functional dyspeptic patients without any use of NSAID or gastric erosions could have a better evolution of their dyspeptic symptoms after Helicobacter eradication than the placebo control...
Date First Received: November 27, 2006
Last Updated: June 19, 2008
Verified by: Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, June 2008
Clinical Trial Phase: Phase 3 | Start Date: November 2006
Overall Status: Active, not recruiting
Estimated Enrollment: 407
Brief Summary
Official Title: “Dyspeptic Symptoms Evolution After Eradication of Helicobacter Pylori in Patients With Different Endoscopic Findings: a Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial With 12 Months of Follow-up”
Condition Keyword(s):
Intervention(s):
A double-blind clinical trial investigating if a sub-group of functional dyspeptic patients without any use of NSAID or gastric erosions could have a better evolution of their dyspeptic symptoms after Helicobacter eradication than the placebo control group
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Placebo Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Study Primary Completion Date: May 2009
Detailed Clinical Trial Description
Objective: investigate if a sub-group of functional dyspeptic patients without any use of NSAID or gastric erosions could have a better evolution of their dyspeptic symptoms after Helicobacter eradication than the placebo control group
Design: A randomized double-blind placebo controlled clinical trial
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with more than 18 years, Functional dyspepsia accordingly Rome III criteria, Helicobacter pylori infection by two diagnostic tests
Exclusion Criteria: No concordance with informed consent; Pregnant woman or breast feeding or no trust anticonceptional method; Structural gastrointestinal abnormalities except gastritis, duodenitis or hiatal hernia; Previous treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection; Previous surgery on esophagus, stomach or duodenum; Hypersensitivity to the drugs in study; Proton pump inhibitor use in the previous 15 days; H2-antagonists use in the previous 07 days; Antibiotics use in the previous 30 days; Patients unable to answer the study questionnaires; Alcohol abuse; Drug use; Serious comorbidities; Biliary colic; Irritable bowel syndrome; Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Interventions: amoxicillin, clarythromycin, omeprazole for 10 days
Control: Placebo
Outcomes:
Primary: Proportion of patients with 50% reduction of baseline symptoms score measured by the validated Porto Alegre Dyspeptic Symptoms Questionnaire Secondary: Proportion of patients with 100% reduction of baseline symptoms score measured by the validated Porto Alegre Dyspeptic Symptoms Questionnaire; Need of rescue medication; Median difference of score between groups; Mean SF-36 scores evolution between groups; Lost of productivity measured by WPAI between groups
Visits: screening, baseline, 4, 8, 12 months
Endoscopic evaluation: screening, 12 months
Helicobacter detection methods: urease, histology (3 pathologists) performed at screening and 12 months
Intervention(s) in this Clinical Trial
- Drug: Amoxicillin, Clarythromycin, Omeprazole for ten days
- Amoxicillin 1000 mg BID, clarythromycin 500 mg BID for ten days in the experimental group and placebo of Amoxicillin 1000 mg BID and placebo of clarythromycin 500 mg BID in the placebo comparator. Both groups receive omeprazole 20 mg bid for 10 days.
Arms, Groups and Cohorts in this Clinical Trial
- Experimental: 1
- Amoxicillin 1000 mg BID, clarythromycin 500 mg BID and Omeprazole 20 mg BID for ten days
- Placebo Comparator: 2
- Placebo of Amoxicillin 1000 mg BID, placebo of clarythromycin 500 mg BID and Omeprazole 20 mg BID for ten days
Outcome Measures for this Clinical Trial
Primary Measures
- Proportion of patients with 50% reduction of baseline symptoms score measured by the validated Porto Alegre Dyspeptic Symptoms Questionnaire
- Time Frame: the last visit among the antecipated visits (4, 8 and 12 months)
Safety Issue?: No
- Time Frame: the last visit among the antecipated visits (4, 8 and 12 months)
Secondary Measures
- Proportion of patients with 100% reduction of baseline symptoms score measured by the validated Porto Alegre Dyspeptic Symptoms Questionnaire
- Time Frame: the last visit among the antecipated visits (4, 8 and 12 months)
Safety Issue?: No
- Time Frame: the last visit among the antecipated visits (4, 8 and 12 months)
- Need of rescue medication
- Time Frame: 4, 8 and 12 months
Safety Issue?: Yes
- Time Frame: 4, 8 and 12 months
- Median difference of score between groups
- Time Frame: the last visit among the antecipated visits (4, 8 and 12 months)
Safety Issue?: No
- Time Frame: the last visit among the antecipated visits (4, 8 and 12 months)
- Mean SF-36 scores evolution between groups
- Time Frame: 12 months
Safety Issue?: Yes
- Time Frame: 12 months
- Lost of productivity measured by WPAI between groups
- Time Frame: 12 months
Safety Issue?: Yes
- Time Frame: 12 months
- Adverse Events
- Time Frame: 4 , 8 and 12 months
Safety Issue?: Yes
- Time Frame: 4 , 8 and 12 months
Criteria for Participation in this Clinical Trial
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with more than 18 years
- Functional dyspepsia accordingly Rome III criteria
- Helicobacter pylori infection by two diagnostic tests
Exclusion Criteria:
- No concordance with informed consent
- Pregnant woman or breast feeding or no trust anticonceptional method
- Structural gastrointestinal abnormalities except gastritis, duodenitis or hiatal hernia
- Previous treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection
- Previous surgery on esophagus, stomach or duodenum
- Hypersensitivity to the drugs in study
- Proton pump inhibitor use in the previous 15 days
- H2-antagonists use in the previous 07 days
- Antibiotics use in the previous 30 days
- Patients unable to answer the study questionnaires
- Alcohol abuse
- Drug use
- Serious comorbidities
- Biliary colic
- Irritable bowel syndrome
- Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Gender Eligibility for this Clinical Trial: Both
Minimum Age for this Clinical Trial: 18 Years
Maximum Age for this Clinical Trial: N/A
Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted for this Clinical Trial?: No
Clinical Trial Sponsor Information
Lead Sponsor: Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Overall Clinical Trial Officials and Contacts
Luiz E Mazzoleni, MD, MsC, PhD Principal Investigator Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Related Publications
References
Mazzoleni LE, Sander GB, Ott EA, Barros SG, Francesconi CF, Polanczyk CA, Wortmann AC, Theil AL, Fritscher LG, Rivero LF, Cartell A, Edelweiss MI, Uchoa DM, Prolla JC. Clinical outcomes of eradication of Helicobacter pylori in nonulcer dyspepsia in a population with a high prevalence of infection: results of a 12-month randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. Dig Dis Sci. 2006 Jan;51(1):89-98.
Ott EA, Mazzoleni LE, Edelweiss MI, Sander GB, Wortmann AC, Theil AL, Somm G, Cartell A, Rivero LF, Uchoa DM, Francesconi CF, Prolla JC. Helicobacter pylori eradication does not cause reflux oesophagitis in functional dyspeptic patients: a randomized, investigator-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 May 15;21(10):1231-9.
Sander GB, Mazzoleni LE, Francesconi CF, Wortmann AC, Ott EA, Theil A, Da Cruz PV, Da Silva AC, Oliveira L, Beheregaray S, Matioti S, Somm G, Goldim JR. Development and validation of a cross-cultural questionnaire to evaluate nonulcer dyspepsia: the Porto Alegre Dyspeptic Symptoms Questionnaire (PADYQ). Dig Dis Sci. 2004 Nov-Dec;49(11-12):1822-9.
Additional Information
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on October 06, 2008
Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00404534
Study ID Number: 05-422
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00404534
Health Authority: Brazil: National Committee of Ethics in Research
Clinical Trials Authorship and Review
Clinical Trials content is provided directly by the U.S. National Institutes of Health via ClinicalTrials.gov and is not reviewed separately by ClinicalTrialsFeeds.org. Every page of specific clinical trials information contains a unique identifier which can be used to find further details directly from the National Institutes of Health.