Chronic kidney disease (CKD)has become a significant health problem worldwide. Strategies to decrease the rate of progression of this disease and reduce the number of patients needing dialysis or renal transplantation are urgently needed. In this study we wish to compare the effect of dual blockade of renin-angiotensin system (ACE inhibitors plus angiotensin II receptor blocker) compared to the...
Date First Received: January 8, 2007
Last Updated: January 8, 2007
Verified by: University of Sao Paulo, January 2007
Clinical Trial Phase: Phase 4 | Start Date: May 2005
Overall Status: Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment: 80
Brief Summary
Official Title: “Effect of Enalapril and Losartan Association Therapy on Proteinuria and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Diabetic Nephropathy: a Clinical Trial on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus”
Condition Keyword(s):
Intervention(s):
Chronic kidney disease (CKD)has become a significant health problem worldwide. Strategies to decrease the rate of progression of this disease and reduce the number of patients needing dialysis or renal transplantation are urgently needed. In this study we wish to compare the effect of dual blockade of renin-angiotensin system (ACE inhibitors plus angiotensin II receptor blocker) compared to the effect of ACE inhibitor monotherapy in patients with diabetic chronic nephropathy.
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
Detailed Clinical Trial Description
Diabetic kidney disease is the current leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the world. Despite all efforts to control this disease, rates of CKD progression are still high and a significant number of patients will ultimately need renal replacement therapy.
Pharmacological blockade of renin-angiotensin system is one of the key elements of CKD secondary prevention, and ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor 1 blocker (ARB)can be used for this purpose. However, it is still not clear if dual blockade (ACEi and ARBs simultaneously)is superior to monotherapy with ACE inhibitors or ARBs. A recent trial has suggested that dual blockade is superior to monotherapy in non-diabetic chronic kidney disease. The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the effect of combination therapy compared to ACE inhibitors alone in type 2 diabetic patients with macroalbuminuric diabetic nephropathy.
Intervention(s) in this Clinical Trial
- Drug: enalapril
- Drug: losartan
Outcome Measures for this Clinical Trial
Primary Measures
- effect of treatment on proteinuria after 8 months of follow-up
Secondary Measures
- effect of treatment on urinary inflammatory biomarkers after 8 months of follow-up
- incidence of hyperkalemia
Criteria for Participation in this Clinical Trial
Inclusion Criteria:
- diabetic nephropathy characterised by a daily proteinuria superior to 500 mg
- type II diabetes
Exclusion Criteria:
- type 1 diabetes
- serum creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL or creatinine clearance lower than 30 ml/min
- serum potassium > 5.5 mEq/L
- intolerance or allergy to ACE inhibitors or BRA
- pregnancy
- hepatitis C or B
- HIV
- current chemotherapy treatment
Gender Eligibility for this Clinical Trial: Both
Minimum Age for this Clinical Trial: 30 Years
Maximum Age for this Clinical Trial: N/A
Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted for this Clinical Trial?: No
Clinical Trial Sponsor Information
Lead Sponsor: University of Sao Paulo
Overall Clinical Trial Officials and Contacts
Roberto Zatz, Full Professor of Nephrology Study Director Nephrology Department, Sao Paulo University Medical School
Overall Contact: Silvia MO Titan, PhD student 55-11-5521-6627 silviatitan@superig.com.br
Additional Information
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on October 06, 2008
Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00419835
Study ID Number: ST01
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00419835
Health Authority: Brazil: National Committee of Ethics in Research
Clinical Trials Authorship and Review
Clinical Trials content is provided directly by the U.S. National Institutes of Health via ClinicalTrials.gov and is not reviewed separately by ClinicalTrialsFeeds.org. Every page of specific clinical trials information contains a unique identifier which can be used to find further details directly from the National Institutes of Health.