The purpose of the study is to determine the safety and efficacy of ibuprofen, compared with indomethacin, in the treatment for the closure of the patent ductus arteriosus in premature babies born under 29 weeks...
Date First Received: May 7, 2007
Last Updated: May 7, 2007
Verified by: KK Women's and Children's Hospital, May 2007
Clinical Trial Phase: Phase 4 | Start Date: May 2007
Overall Status: Not yet recruiting
Estimated Enrollment: 150
Brief Summary
Official Title: “A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Ibuprofen And Indomethacin For The Treatment Of The Patent Ductus Arteriosus In Very Premature Infants”
Condition Keyword(s):
Intervention(s):
The purpose of the study is to determine the safety and efficacy of ibuprofen, compared with indomethacin, in the treatment for the closure of the patent ductus arteriosus in premature babies born under 29 weeks gestation
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Detailed Clinical Trial Description
According to Very Low Birth Weight (VLBW) High Risk Registration database in KKWCH, a hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is a common problem in very premature infants born at a gestational age of 29 weeks and under, with more than 50% of them needing indomethacin treatment for closure of the PDA.
Prostaglandins play a major role in keeping the ductus patent . Indomethacin, because of its anti-prostaglandin effect via inhibition of the prostaglandin forming cyclo-oxygenase enzymes, has been used to medically close the PDA since the 1970s. Concerns with this drug relate to its effect on cerebral, renal and gastrointestinal blood flow. Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), gastrointestinal perforation, gastrointestinal bleeding, transient or permanent renal impairment and reduced cerebral blood flow have been associated with indomethacin.
Ibuprofen treatment for PDA have been reported in the 1990s. It is as effective as indomethacin in closing the PDA. It is potentially better than indomethacin because regional blood flows were not affected. The few trials that have been done comparing intravenous ibuprofen and indomethacin involved mainly heavier very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. In a New England Journal of Medicine editorial on this subject, Clyman pointed out the need for trials involving the very immature infants to look at efficacy and safety.
The main obstacle for ibuprofen use in premature infants is the absence of a commercially available intravenous preparation. In our proposed trial a new i.v. ibuprofen preparation manufactured by Cumberland Pharmaceuticals (Nashville, Tennessee) will be used.
A Cochrane systematic review on ibuprofen for the treatment of PDA in premature infants concluded that it performed with the same effectiveness when compared to indomethacin. There was a significant decrease in the incidence of oliguria in the ibuprofen arm, with a higher risk of chronic lung disease at 28 days of life (borderline statistical significance), but not at 36 weeks.There is no biologically plausible explanation for the latter effect and this could be attributed to chance in view of this, plus the weak statistical proof. The other problem with this review was that it included trials where enteral ibuprofen was used, and this route is clearly impractical in the very premature infants which we plan to study because of the unpredictable absorption from the immature gut and their general intolerance to feeding at such an early age. The concern regarding pulmonary hypertension with the prophylactic use of ibuprofen also should not apply to our planned study where the time of administration of the drugs will be around 24 hours of age.
The potential benefits stemming from ibuprofen’s biological advantage over indomethacin will be reduction in the rates of oliguria, gastrointestinal bleeding, NEC and gastrointestinal perforation. NEC and gastrointestinal perforation are conditions with serious morbidities and usually result in prolonged hospital stay and poorer neurodevelopmental outcome for the affected infants. A better drug could lead to cost savings.
Neurosensory impairment is an important outcome to monitor because indomethacin reduces cerebral blood flow. This point was also emphasized in the Cochrane systematic review mentioned above. However this will be the subject of another proposal in view of the significant additional budget needed.
The objective of the trial is to compare, the the safety and efficacy of intravenous ibuprofen treatment for the closure of the patent ductus arteriosus diagnosed via 2D echocardiography in very premature babies born under 29 weeks of gestation, with traditional therapy indomethacin.
The primary outcome measure will be the incidence of oliguria and gastric bleeding within one week after the 1st dose of treatment
Intervention(s) in this Clinical Trial
- Drug: Ibuprofen and Indomethacin
Outcome Measures for this Clinical Trial
Primary Measures
- Incidence of oliguria and gastric bleeding
- Time Frame: within one week of treatment
- Time Frame: within one week of treatment
Secondary Measures
- PDA closure rates after medical treatment at time of discharge from hospital
- Time Frame: after 1 to 2 courses of treatment
- Time Frame: after 1 to 2 courses of treatment
- Need for repeat of the second course of medication
- Time Frame: 48 hrs after 3rd dose of treatment
- Time Frame: 48 hrs after 3rd dose of treatment
- Need for surgical closure
- Time Frame: after 1 to 2 courses of treatment
- Time Frame: after 1 to 2 courses of treatment
- In-hospital mortality
- Time Frame: while in-hospital
- Time Frame: while in-hospital
- Creatinine >140umol/L within one week after the 1st dose of treatment
- Time Frame: one week after 1st dose of treatment
- Time Frame: one week after 1st dose of treatment
- Hyponatremia within one week after the 1st dose of treatment
- Time Frame: one week after 1st dose of treatment
- Time Frame: one week after 1st dose of treatment
- Gastrointestinal perforation within one week after the 1st dose of treatment
- Time Frame: within one week after the 1st dose of treatment
- Time Frame: within one week after the 1st dose of treatment
- Necrotising enterocolitis within one week after the 1st dose of treatment
- Time Frame: within one week after the 1st dose of treatment
- Time Frame: within one week after the 1st dose of treatment
- Worst grade of IVH by Day 28 of life
- Time Frame: Day 28 of life
- Time Frame: Day 28 of life
- Pulmonary hypertension within 48hrs after 1st dose of treatment
- Time Frame: within 48hrs after 1st dose of treatment
- Time Frame: within 48hrs after 1st dose of treatment
- Chronic lung disease
- Time Frame: Day 28 and corrected age of 36 weeks post-menstrual age
- Time Frame: Day 28 and corrected age of 36 weeks post-menstrual age
- Cystic periventricular leukomalacia at day 28 of life and at term
- Time Frame: Day 28 of life and term corrected age
- Time Frame: Day 28 of life and term corrected age
- Retinopathy of prematurity (Worst grade)
- Time Frame: Within hospitalization
- Time Frame: Within hospitalization
Criteria for Participation in this Clinical Trial
Inclusion Criteria:
- Infants <29 weeks gestation with a PDA diameter of >= 1.5 mm on 2Dechocardiogram
- Parental written informed consent - Parent agrees to the subject's participation in the study as indicated by parent's signature on the consent form
- Parent is willing to comply with procedures/treatment and is able to keep to scheduled study assessments
Exclusion criteria:
- Major congenital malformations in the opinion of the investigator
- Necrotising enterocolitis
- Gastrointestinal Perforation
- Systemic illness other than PDA, not fit for the trial in the opinion of the investigator
- The parent is in the opinion of the investigator, mentally or legally incapacitated
- The parent is unwilling/unable to comply to study procedures
Gender Eligibility for this Clinical Trial: Both
Minimum Age for this Clinical Trial: N/A
Maximum Age for this Clinical Trial: 29 Weeks
Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted for this Clinical Trial?: No
Clinical Trial Sponsor Information
Lead Sponsor: KK Women's and Children's Hospital
Overall Clinical Trial Officials and Contacts
Quek Bin Huey, MMed MRCP Principal Investigator KK Women's and Children's Hospital
Additional Information
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on October 10, 2008
Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00470743
Study ID Number: SQPDA02
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00470743
Health Authority: Singapore: Health Sciences Authority
Clinical Trials Authorship and Review
Clinical Trials content is provided directly by the U.S. National Institutes of Health via ClinicalTrials.gov and is not reviewed separately by ClinicalTrialsFeeds.org. Every page of specific clinical trials information contains a unique identifier which can be used to find further details directly from the National Institutes of Health.