A 6-Month, Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Controlled, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Incidence of Gastric Ulcers

This study uses a randomized, double-blind, controlled design and will be conducted in approximately 60 sites aiming to enroll a total number of 400 subjects (200 per arm). A subject is considered to have completed the study if all scheduled assessments up through the 6 month visit have been performed, or the endpoint has been reached: gastric ulcer confirmed by endoscopy...

Date First Received: September 10, 2007

Last Updated: March 20, 2008

Verified by: Pozen, March 2008

Clinical Trial Phase: Phase 3 | Start Date: September 2007

Overall Status: Active, not recruiting

Estimated Enrollment: 400

Brief Summary

Official Title: “A 6-Month, Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Controlled, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Incidence of Gastric Ulcers Following Administration of Either PN 400 or Naproxen in Subjects Who Are at Risk for Developing NSAID-Associated Ulcers”

Condition Keyword(s):

Intervention(s):

This study uses a randomized, double-blind, controlled design and will be conducted in approximately 60 sites aiming to enroll a total number of 400 subjects (200 per arm). A subject is considered to have completed the study if all scheduled assessments up through the 6 month visit have been performed, or the endpoint has been reached: gastric ulcer confirmed by endoscopy.

Study Type: Interventional

Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Placebo Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study

Study Primary Completion Date: August 2008

Detailed Clinical Trial Description

Objectives:

Primary: To demonstrate that PN 400 is effective in reducing the risk of gastric ulcers in subjects at risk for developing NSAID-associated gastric ulcers.

Secondary: - To determine if PN 400 is effective in reducing the risk of duodenal ulcers in subjects at risk for developing NSAID-associated ulcers - To compare upper gastrointestinal symptoms in subjects treated with PN 400 versus naproxen as measured by scores on the Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment (SODA) instrument and the Overall Treatment Evaluation - Dyspepsia (OTE-DP) - To compare heartburn symptoms in subjects treated with PN 400 versus naproxen - To evaluate the safety and tolerability of PN 400 and naproxen

Intervention(s) in this Clinical Trial

  • Drug: PN400
    • PN 400 tablets (naproxen 500 mg and esomeprazole 20 mg) bid taken orally.
  • Drug: naproxen
    • naproxen bid

Arms, Groups and Cohorts in this Clinical Trial

  • Experimental: 1
    • PN 400 twice daily (bid)
  • Active Comparator: 2
    • naproxen

Outcome Measures for this Clinical Trial

Primary Measures

  • A subject is considered to have completed the study if all scheduled assessments up through the 6 month visit have been performed, or the endpoint has been reached: gastric ulcer confirmed by endoscopy.
    • Time Frame: 6 months
      Safety Issue?: No

Criteria for Participation in this Clinical Trial

Gender Eligibility for this Clinical Trial: Both

Minimum Age for this Clinical Trial: 18 Years

Maximum Age for this Clinical Trial: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted for this Clinical Trial?: No

Clinical Trial Sponsor Information

Lead Sponsor: Pozen

Overall Clinical Trial Officials and Contacts

David Taylor Study Director Pozen  

Additional Information

Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on August 08, 2008

Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00527787

Study ID Number: PN400-301 & 302

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00527787

Health Authority: United States: Food and Drug Administration

Clinical Trials Authorship and Review

Clinical Trials content is provided directly by the U.S. National Institutes of Health via ClinicalTrials.gov and is not reviewed separately by ClinicalTrialsFeeds.org. Every page of specific clinical trials information contains a unique identifier which can be used to find further details directly from the National Institutes of Health.