The purpose of this project is to compare the efficacy (how successful) 1) standard-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (rabeprazole 20 mg once daily) (a medication that completely blocks the stomach from producing acid) plus low dose tricyclic antidepressant (nortriptyline 50mg) (TCA); 2) double-dose PPI (rabeprazole 20 mg twice a day); to 3) standard-dose PPI (rabeprazole 20mg once daily) and...
Date First Received: October 3, 2007
Last Updated: October 3, 2007
Verified by: Department of Veterans Affairs, October 2007
Clinical Trial Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3 | Start Date: April 2006
Overall Status: Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment: 150
Brief Summary
Official Title: “Role of Pain Modulation in GERD Patients Who Failed Standard Dose PPI”
Condition Keyword(s):
Intervention(s):
The purpose of this project is to compare the efficacy (how successful) 1) standard-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (rabeprazole 20 mg once daily) (a medication that completely blocks the stomach from producing acid) plus low dose tricyclic antidepressant (nortriptyline 50mg) (TCA); 2) double-dose PPI (rabeprazole 20 mg twice a day); to 3) standard-dose PPI (rabeprazole 20mg once daily) and placebo (an inactive substance, like a sugar pill) to determine the relative symptom resolution and health-related quality of life in gastroesophageal reflux disease (a disease characterized by a burning sensation (heartburn) behind the breast bone caused by a backflow of stomach contents into the esophagus) (GERD) patients who fail standard-dose PPI and you will be randomly assigned (similar to flipping a coin) to one of the three groups.
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Detailed Clinical Trial Description
Failure of standard dose PPI to control GERD symptoms has been increasingly encountered in clinical practice (both primary care and sub-specialties) and has become one of the most challenging therapeutic dilemmas in GERD management. It has been estimated that up to 30% of the patients receiving PPI once daily will continue to report typical GERD symptoms [1].
Presently, increasing the PPI dose has been the standard of care in these patients [2].
However, success in relieving refractory GERD symptoms with such a therapeutic approach has been extremely limited, resulting in frustration of both the patient as well as the health care provided. Furthermore, patients who fail PPI will continue to seek medical attention and may undergo a variety of invasive or non-invasive tests, and thus consume already limited health care resources. Recent advancement in the understanding of the diverse composition of the different GERD groups as well as symptom generation has led to the recognition of alteration in pain perception as an important contributing factor for PPI failure in some and the presence of non-acid related stimuli in others [3].
This study will clarify for the first time the role of pain modulation in patients who failed standard dose of PPI. The clinical experience with doubling the PPI dose, which is the current standard of care, has been very limited and relatively disappointing. Additionally, this study may identify the group of PPI failure patients that may benefit from doubling the dose of PPI and the group that will benefit more from adding a pain modulator. This study is timely, has never been performed and addresses a prevalent emerging clinical dilemma in GI as well as primary care clinics.
Intervention(s) in this Clinical Trial
- Drug: Rabeprazole and low dose Tricyclic antidepressant
- Rabeprazole and low dose Tricyclic antidepressant; Double dose PPI to standard dose PPI and placebo.
Outcome Measures for this Clinical Trial
Primary Measures
- Evaluate the role of pain modulation in GERD patients who fail to obtain clinical relief with standard dose (once daily) PPI. We will compare the efficacy of 1) standard dose PPI plus low-dose TCA to 2) double dose PPI to 3) standard dose PPI and placebo
Criteria for Participation in this Clinical Trial
Inclusion Criteria:
- Currently being treated with a PPI, but continue to experience GERD symptoms (such as heartburn) at least 2 times per week.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known allergy or intolerance to TCA
- Use of antidepressant or a diagnosis of depression
- History of serious arrhythmia or use of anti-arrhythmics
- History of seizures
- Subjects with significant co-morbidity, e.g., cardiovascular, respiratory, urogential, renal, gastrointestinal, hepatic, hematological, endocrine, neurologic or psychiatric
- With evidence or history of drug abuse within the past 6 months
- Erosive esophagitis, esophageal ulceration, peptic stricture, Barrett's esophagus or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus on endoscopy
- History of esophagogastric surgery
- Gastric or duodenal lesions (ulcer, tumor, etc.)
- Women who are pregnant or of childbearing age who are not on contraception
- Patients who are unwilling or unable to provide informed consent
- Insulin dependent diabetes
Gender Eligibility for this Clinical Trial: Both
Minimum Age for this Clinical Trial: 18 Years
Maximum Age for this Clinical Trial: 80 Years
Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted for this Clinical Trial?: No
Clinical Trial Sponsor Information
Lead Sponsor: Department of Veterans Affairs
Overall Clinical Trial Officials and Contacts
Ronnie Fass, MD Principal Investigator SAVAHCS
Overall Contact: Marcia Willis, B.A., CCRC 520-792-1450 marcia.willis@va.gov
Related Publications
References
Carlsson R, Dent J, Watts R, Riley S, Sheikh R, Hatlebakk J, Haug K, de Groot G, van Oudvorst A, Dalvag A, Junghard O, Wiklund I. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care: an international study of different treatment strategies with omeprazole. International GORD Study Group. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998 Feb;10(2):119-24.
Fass R, Murthy U, Hayden CW, Malagon IB, Pulliam G, Wendel C, Kovacs TO. Omeprazole 40 mg once a day is equally effective as lansoprazole 30 mg twice a day in symptom control of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who are resistant to conventional-dose lansoprazole therapy-a prospective, randomized, multi-centre study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000 Dec;14(12):1595-603.
Fass R, Fennerty MB, Vakil N. Nonerosive reflux disease--current concepts and dilemmas. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Feb;96(2):303-14. Review.
Richter JE, Campbell DR, Kahrilas PJ, Huang B, Fludas C. Lansoprazole compared with ranitidine for the treatment of nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Jun 26;160(12):1803-9.
Kahrilas PJ, Falk GW, Johnson DA, Schmitt C, Collins DW, Whipple J, D'Amico D, Hamelin B, Joelsson B. Esomeprazole improves healing and symptom resolution as compared with omeprazole in reflux oesophagitis patients: a randomized controlled trial. The Esomeprazole Study Investigators. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000 Oct;14(10):1249-58.
Additional Information
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on September 05, 2008
Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00539240
Study ID Number: CLIN-022-04F
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00539240
Health Authority: United States: Federal Government
Clinical Trials Authorship and Review
Clinical Trials content is provided directly by the U.S. National Institutes of Health via ClinicalTrials.gov and is not reviewed separately by ClinicalTrialsFeeds.org. Every page of specific clinical trials information contains a unique identifier which can be used to find further details directly from the National Institutes of Health.