Many women choose Depo-Provera for birth control because it is easy to use and very effective. However, a significant number of Depo-Provera users experience irregular bleeding during the first 90 days. Many users discontinue after their first injection due to irregular bleeding. This study will evaluate the effect of using an estrogen vaginal ring during the first 90 days of Depo-Provera use to...
Date First Received: November 21, 2007
Last Updated: July 9, 2008
Verified by: Columbia University, July 2008
Clinical Trial Phase: N/A | Start Date: September 2007
Overall Status: Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment: 72
Brief Summary
Official Title: “Pilot Study of Femring Estrogen Supplementation During Depo-Provera Initiation”
Condition Keyword(s):
Intervention(s):
Many women choose Depo-Provera for birth control because it is easy to use and very effective. However, a significant number of Depo-Provera users experience irregular bleeding during the first 90 days. Many users discontinue after their first injection due to irregular bleeding. This study will evaluate the effect of using an estrogen vaginal ring during the first 90 days of Depo-Provera use to see if it is acceptable to women and whether it decreases irregular bleeding during the first 90 days of use and increases continuation to a second injection.
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Prevention, Randomized, Open Label, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
Study Primary Completion Date: March 2009
Detailed Clinical Trial Description
Many women choose depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) for contraception because it is long-acting, highly effective, and requires minimal user involvement. One of the most common side effects of DMPA use during the first 90 day cycle is irregular bleeding. There are few studies that report mean number of bleeding days among DMPA users. A large World Health Organization (WHO) trial including ten international centers and menstrual data on 748 women using DMPA including 372 woman-years of follow-up reported 23.6 mean days of spotting and bleeding during the first cycle with a standard deviation of 18.9 days (WHO). Another study sponsored by WHO (n=575) reported that 25% of subjects had bleeding/spotting episodes during the first cycle of DMPA that exceeded 13 days. The number of bleeding/spotting days and number of bleeding/spotting episodes decreased over successive reference periods (Said 1987).
Discontinuation rates are high after the first injection and related to irregular bleeding.
Rates of discontinuation after the first injection range from 15-60% but were around 30% in most studies (Harel, Paul, Polaneczy, Lim, Hubacher, Sangi, Rickert). Several studies noted that the largest percentage of discontinuation during the first year of DMPA use occurs after the first injection (Rickert, Hubacher, Lim). Irregular bleeding is uniformly cited as one of the most common reasons for discontinuation, accounting for 17-60% of all reasons given (Harel, Paul, Polaneczy, Lim, Sangi). An intervention to prevent or minimize irregular bleeding during the first 90 days of DMPA use could potentially minimize or prevent this bothersome side effect and thus improve continuation.
Few studies have examined the effect of prophylactic or therapeutic estrogen supplementation on irregular bleeding in DMPA users. A randomized trial (n=132) of cyclic transdermal estradiol 0.1mg/day (Climara) for 3 months versus placebo in women initiating DMPA immediately post-abortion showed no difference in continuation rates at 12 months; however, the authors of this study reported a high rate of non-compliance with the study protocol and lacked an adequate sample size to detect a difference (Goldberg). This is the only study to report on prophylactic estrogen supplementation in DMPA users.
Two studies evaluated therapeutic estrogen supplementation in DMPA users. In 1996, WHO published results of a trial in which women using DMPA and experiencing a bleeding episode greater than 7 days during the first or second injection interval were offered treatment.
Subjects (n=278) were randomized to a 14 day course of 50mcg ethinyl estradiol, 2.5 mg oestrone sulphate, or placebo. The authors found that subjects treated with ethinyl estradiol had shorter median time to cessation of bleeding and fewer bleeding/spotting days (Said 1996). An observational study (n=131) of adolescents reporting vaginal bleeding on DMPA who were treated with monophasic oral contraceptive pills identified improvement of bleeding patterns and a high rate of continuation in those receiving treatment (Rager).
Estrogen supplementation appears to be more effective than placebo in stopping and decreasing bleeding in Norplant users. Women who presented with a spontaneous complaint of prolonged or irregular bleeding were randomly assigned to receive 20 days of treatment with a combined oral contraceptive, 50mcg ethinyl estradiol, or placebo. Both combined oral contraceptive pills and estradiol were significantly more effective than placebo in stopping bleeding and decreasing the mean number of bleeding days during treatment (Alvarez).
To summarize, prior studies have not identified an acceptable or effective prophylactic intervention to prevent or minimize irregular bleeding or improve continuation rates in DMPA users. The first cycle of DMPA is a critical time for such an intervention. Our study will evaluate estrogen supplementation with an estrogen vaginal ring during the first 90 days of DMPA use versus no estrogen supplementation and report on acceptability, bleeding patterns, and continuation rates. Femring®, an estradiol vaginal ring currently used for treatment of postmenopausal symptoms, provides 100mcg of estradiol per day with one ring designed for 90 days of consecutive use. This dose provides systemic levels sufficient to suppress vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women (Speroff). The vaginal ring would require minimal user involvement when placed at the time of DMPA initiation. If acceptable and effective, this intervention could prevent or minimize irregular bleeding and improve continuation rates of this highly effective contraceptive method.
Intervention(s) in this Clinical Trial
- Drug: Femring
- Estrogen vaginal ring (100mcg) placed for the first 90 days of Depo-Provera use.
Arms, Groups and Cohorts in this Clinical Trial
- Experimental: 1
- Subjects will receive an estrogen vaginal ring (100mcg) during the first 90 days of Depo-Provera use.
- No Intervention: 2
- Subjects will receive Depo-Provera intramuscular injection.
Outcome Measures for this Clinical Trial
Primary Measures
- Mean Number of Bleeding or Spotting Days
- Time Frame: 6 months
Safety Issue?: No
- Time Frame: 6 months
Secondary Measures
- Acceptability of Femring in Users
- Time Frame: 3 months
Safety Issue?: No
- Time Frame: 3 months
- Percentage of Subjects who receive a 2nd injection of Depo-Provera
- Time Frame: 3 months
Safety Issue?: No
- Time Frame: 3 months
- Percentage of subjects who receive a 3rd injection
- Time Frame: 6 months
Safety Issue?: No
- Time Frame: 6 months
Criteria for Participation in this Clinical Trial
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women age 18 or older who are initiating Depo-Provera for contraception
- English or Spanish-speaking
- Have a negative urine pregnancy test
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contraindications to either Depo-Provera or Femring (estrogen vaginal ring)
- Have used Depo-Provera or Mirena in the prior 6 months
- Have had an induced abortion, spontaneous abortion, or birth in prior 8 weeks
Gender Eligibility for this Clinical Trial: Female
Minimum Age for this Clinical Trial: 18 Years
Maximum Age for this Clinical Trial: N/A
Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted for this Clinical Trial?: No
Clinical Trial Sponsor Information
Lead Sponsor: Columbia University
Overall Clinical Trial Officials and Contacts
Angela R Dempsey-Fanning, MD Principal Investigator Columbia University Medical Center
Overall Contact: Angela R Dempsey-Fanning, MD 212-305-4938 ard2117@columbia.edu
Related Publications
References
Alvarez-Sanchez F, Brache V, Thevenin F, Cochon L, Faundes A. Hormonal treatment for bleeding irregularities in Norplant implant users. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Mar;174(3):919-22.
Belsey EM, Machin D, d'Arcangues C. The analysis of vaginal bleeding patterns induced by fertility regulating methods. World Health Organization Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction. Contraception. 1986 Sep;34(3):253-60.
Dieben TO, Roumen FJ, Apter D. Efficacy, cycle control, and user acceptability of a novel combined contraceptive vaginal ring. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Sep;100(3):585-93.
Goldberg AB, Cardenas LH, Hubbard AE, Darney PD. Post-abortion depot medroxyprogesterone acetate continuation rates: a randomized trial of cyclic estradiol. Contraception. 2002 Oct;66(4):215-20.
Harel Z, Biro FM, Kollar LM, Rauh JL. Adolescents' reasons for and experience after discontinuation of the long-acting contraceptives Depo-Provera and Norplant. J Adolesc Health. 1996 Aug;19(2):118-23.
Hubacher D, Goco N, Gonzalez B, Taylor D. Factors affecting continuation rates of DMPA. Contraception. 1999 Dec;60(6):345-51.
Lim SW, Rieder J, Coupey SM, Bijur PE. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate use in inner-city, minority adolescents: continuation rates and characteristics of long-term users. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Oct;153(10):1068-72.
Novak A, de la Loge C, Abetz L, van der Meulen EA. The combined contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing: an international study of user acceptability. Contraception. 2003 Mar;67(3):187-94.
Paul C, Skegg DC, Williams S. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. Patterns of use and reasons for discontinuation. Contraception. 1997 Oct;56(4):209-14.
Polaneczky M, Liblanc M. Long-term depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo-Provera) use in inner-city adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 1998 Aug;23(2):81-8.
Rager KM, Fpwler A, Omar HA. Successful treatment of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate-related vaginal bleeding improves continuation rates in adolescents. ScientificWorldJournal. 2006 Mar 19;6:353-5.
Rickert VI, Tiezzi L, Lipshutz J, León J, Vaughan RD, Westhoff C. Depo Now: preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents and young adults. J Adolesc Health. 2007 Jan;40(1):22-8.
Said S, Omar K, Koetsawang S, Kiriwat O, Srisatayapan Y, Kazi A, Ajmal F, Wynter HH, Pretnar-Darovec A, Benitez IB. A multicentered phase III comparative clinical trial of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate given three-monthly at doses of 100 mg or 150 mg: II. The comparison of bleeding patterns. World Health Organization. Task Force on Long-Acting Systemic Agents for Fertility Regulation Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction. Contraception. 1987 Jun;35(6):591-610.
Said S, Sadek W, Rocca M, Koetsawang S, Kirwat O, Piya-Anant M, Dusitsin N, Sethavanich S, Affandi B, Hadisaputra W, Kazi A, Ramos RM, d'Arcangues C, Belsey EM, Noonan E, Olayinka I, Pinol A. Clinical evaluation of the therapeutic effectiveness of ethinyl oestradiol and oestrone sulphate on prolonged bleeding in women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception. World Health Organization, Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Task Force on Long-acting Systemic Agents for Fertility Regulation. Hum Reprod. 1996 Oct;11 Suppl 2:1-13.
Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Poindexter AN 3rd, Bateman L, Ditmore JR. Experiences of injectable contraceptive users in an urban setting. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Aug;88(2):227-33.
Speroff L. Efficacy and tolerability of a novel estradiol vaginal ring for relief of menopausal symptoms. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Oct;102(4):823-34.
[No authors listed] Multinational comparative clinical evaluation of two long-acting injectable contraceptive steroids: noresthisterone oenanthate and medroxyprogesterone acetate. 2. Bleeding patterns and side effects. Contraception. 1978 May;17(5):395-406.
Additional Information
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on October 10, 2008
Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00563576
Study ID Number: AAAC6363
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00563576
Health Authority: United States: Institutional Review Board
Clinical Trials Authorship and Review
Clinical Trials content is provided directly by the U.S. National Institutes of Health via ClinicalTrials.gov and is not reviewed separately by ClinicalTrialsFeeds.org. Every page of specific clinical trials information contains a unique identifier which can be used to find further details directly from the National Institutes of Health.