We hypothesize that those patients with purely seasonal allergic rhinitis will decongest better than those subjects with another cause contributing to their symptoms. These latter patients will not improve as well on an intranasal steroid as those who decongest well, potentially explaining the 60% response rate in prior studies...
Date First Received: February 6, 2008
Last Updated: February 19, 2008
Verified by: University of Chicago, February 2008
Clinical Trial Phase: N/A | Start Date: April 2008
Overall Status: Not yet recruiting
Estimated Enrollment: 40
Brief Summary
Official Title: “Does the Response to a Nasal Decongestant Test Predict the Outcome to Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis With Nasonex?”
Condition Keyword(s):
Intervention(s):
We hypothesize that those patients with purely seasonal allergic rhinitis will decongest better than those subjects with another cause contributing to their symptoms. These latter patients will not improve as well on an intranasal steroid as those who decongest well, potentially explaining the 60% response rate in prior studies.
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Other, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Placebo Control, Parallel Assignment
Study Primary Completion Date: October 2008
Intervention(s) in this Clinical Trial
- Drug: mometasone furoate nasal spray
- 2 puffs in each nostril once a day for 2 weeks
- Drug: placebo
- 2 puffs in each nostril once a day for 2 weeks
Arms, Groups and Cohorts in this Clinical Trial
- Active Comparator: 1
- 2 weeks of treatment
- Placebo Comparator: 2
- 2 weeks of treatment
Outcome Measures for this Clinical Trial
Primary Measures
- correlation in Nasonex group of change in airflow (nasal peak inspiratory flow)on decongestant test and global assessment
- Time Frame: prior to and after 2 weeks of treatment
Safety Issue?: No
- Time Frame: prior to and after 2 weeks of treatment
Secondary Measures
- symptom diaries
- Time Frame: over 2 weeks of treatment
Safety Issue?: No
- Time Frame: over 2 weeks of treatment
- changes in RQLQ
- Time Frame: over 2 weeks of treatment
Safety Issue?: No
- Time Frame: over 2 weeks of treatment
Criteria for Participation in this Clinical Trial
Inclusion Criteria
- 1. Males and females between 18 and 60 years of age.
- 2. History of grass and/or ragweed allergic rhinitis.
- 3. Positive skin or RAST test to grass, trees and/or ragweed antigen.
- 4. Symptomatic at time of entry into study.
Exclusion Criteria
- 1. Women of childbearing potential not using the contraception method(s) (Birth control pills, depo Provera, double barrier) as well as women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
- 2. Patients with severe medical condition(s) that in the view of the investigator prohibits participation in the study (heart, lung, kidney, neurological, oncologic or liver disease).
- 3. Use of any other investigational agent in the last 30 days.
- 4. Absence of nasal symptoms.
- 5. Smoking.
- 6. URI at the time of screening.
Gender Eligibility for this Clinical Trial: Both
Minimum Age for this Clinical Trial: 18 Years
Maximum Age for this Clinical Trial: 60 Years
Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted for this Clinical Trial?: No
Clinical Trial Sponsor Information
Lead Sponsor: University of Chicago
Overall Clinical Trial Officials and Contacts
Ro M Naclerio, MD Principal Investigator University of Chicago
Additional Information
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on September 05, 2008
Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00618332
Study ID Number: 15624B
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00618332
Health Authority: United States: Institutional Review Board
Clinical Trials Authorship and Review
Clinical Trials content is provided directly by the U.S. National Institutes of Health via ClinicalTrials.gov and is not reviewed separately by ClinicalTrialsFeeds.org. Every page of specific clinical trials information contains a unique identifier which can be used to find further details directly from the National Institutes of Health.