T.E.A. Study Three Days Ertapenem vs Three Days Ampicillin- Sulbactam

The aim of the study was to compare the activity (efficacy and safety) of Ertapenem administered according to a short treatment for three days versus a short treatment for three days with AS in patients with an community acquired IAI of mild to moderate severity...

Date First Received: February 27, 2008

Last Updated: February 27, 2008

Verified by: University of Bologna, February 2008

Clinical Trial Phase: Phase 4 | Start Date: January 2008

Overall Status: Recruiting

Estimated Enrollment: 142

Brief Summary

Official Title: “A Prospective, Double-Blind, Multi Center, Randomized Clinical Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Ertapenem 3 Days Versus Ampicillin-Sulbactam 3 Days in the Treatment of Localized Community Acquired Intra-Abdominal Infection (IAI). (T.E.A. Study Three Days Ertapenem vs Three Days Ampicillin- Sulbactam)”

The aim of the study was to compare the activity (efficacy and safety) of Ertapenem administered according to a short treatment for three days versus a short treatment for three days with AS in patients with an community acquired IAI of mild to moderate severity.

Study Type: Interventional

Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor), Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study

Study Primary Completion Date: March 2010

Detailed Clinical Trial Description

The study project is a prospective, randomized controlled investigation. The study will be performed in the Department of Transplant, General and Emergency Surgery of St Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital (Bologna, Italy), a large teaching institution, with the participation of all surgeons who accept to be involved in.

The study is designed and conducted in compliance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice regulations.

The tolerability and efficacy of a 3 days treatment with Ampicillin- Sulbactam (AS 3g x 3/ day i.v.) is compared a 3 days regimen with Ertapenem (1 g/day i.v.). in patients with localized peritonitis with a blinded evaluation of efficacy end points. Evaluation of cure or failure is blinded by use of designated third party individuals who are unaware of the treatment assigned to the patients.

Intervention(s) in this Clinical Trial

  • Drug: Ertapenem
    • 3 days regimen with Ertapenem (1 g/day i.v.)
  • Drug: Ampicillin-Sulbactam
    • 3 days treatment with Ampicillin-Sulbactam (AS 3g x 3/ day i.v.)

Arms, Groups and Cohorts in this Clinical Trial

  • Experimental: E
    • 3 days regimen with Ertapenem
  • Active Comparator: AS
    • 3 days treatment with Ampicillin-Sulbactam

Outcome Measures for this Clinical Trial

Primary Measures

  • compare the failure rate of short therapy with Ertapenem and with AS in localized IAI
    • Time Frame: 3 days
      Safety Issue?: Yes

Secondary Measures

  • any other complication
    • Time Frame: intraoperatively, postoperatively, at discharge, at 7-days, 1-month, 6-months follow-up
      Safety Issue?: Yes
  • The total costs of antibiotic therapy
    • Time Frame: during hospital stay
      Safety Issue?: No

Criteria for Participation in this Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (>18 years) requiring surgical intervention within 24 hours of diagnosis, for localized IAI infections (i.e extending beyond the organ wall but confined near the hollow viscus, mild to moderate in severity):
  • Acute appendicitis: Ruptured or perforated with abscess
  • Acute diverticulitis with perforation and/or abscess
  • Acute cholecystitis (including gangrenous) with either rupture or perforation
  • Acute gastric and duodenal (> 24 hours) perforation
  • Traumatic (> 12 hours) perforation of the intestines
  • Secondary peritonitis due to perforated viscus
  • Intra-abdominal abscess (including of liver and spleen)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • traumatic bowel perforation requiring surgery within 12 hours
  • perforation of gastroduodenal ulcers requiring surgery within 24 hours
  • other intra-abdominal processes in which the primary etiology was unlikely to be infectious.
  • patients lactating or pregnant
  • patients with a history of allergy, hypersensitivity, or any severe reaction to the study antibiotics
  • patients with rapidly progressive or terminal illness;
  • patients with a history or presence of severe hepatic or renal disease (e.g.
  • creatinine clearance < 0.5 ml/min/1.73 m2);
  • patients with a concomitant infection that would interfere with evaluation of response to the study antibiotics.

Gender Eligibility for this Clinical Trial: Both

Minimum Age for this Clinical Trial: 18 Years

Maximum Age for this Clinical Trial: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted for this Clinical Trial?: No

Clinical Trial Sponsor Information

Lead Sponsor: University of Bologna

Overall Clinical Trial Officials and Contacts

Fausto Catena, MD PhD Study Director S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital - University of Bologna  

Overall Contact: Fausto Catena, MD PhD +390516363235 fausto.catena@aosp.bo.it

Related Publications

References

Basoli A, Chirletti P, Cirino E, D'Ovidio NG, Doglietto GB, Giglio D, Giulini SM, Malizia A, Taffurelli M, Petrovic J, Ecari M; Italian Study Group. A prospective, double-blind, multicenter, randomized trial comparing ertapenem 3 vs >/=5 days in community-acquired intraabdominal infection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Mar;12(3):592-600. Epub 2007 Sep 11.

Additional Information

Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on September 04, 2008

Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00630513

Study ID Number: T.E.A. Study

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00630513

Health Authority: Italy: Ethics Committee

Clinical Trials Authorship and Review

Clinical Trials content is provided directly by the U.S. National Institutes of Health via ClinicalTrials.gov and is not reviewed separately by ClinicalTrialsFeeds.org. Every page of specific clinical trials information contains a unique identifier which can be used to find further details directly from the National Institutes of Health.