The aim of the study was to compare the activity (efficacy and safety) of Ertapenem administered according to a short treatment for three days versus a short treatment for three days with AS in patients with an community acquired IAI of mild to moderate severity...
Date First Received: February 27, 2008
Last Updated: February 27, 2008
Verified by: University of Bologna, February 2008
Clinical Trial Phase: Phase 4 | Start Date: January 2008
Overall Status: Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment: 142
Brief Summary
Official Title: “A Prospective, Double-Blind, Multi Center, Randomized Clinical Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Ertapenem 3 Days Versus Ampicillin-Sulbactam 3 Days in the Treatment of Localized Community Acquired Intra-Abdominal Infection (IAI). (T.E.A. Study Three Days Ertapenem vs Three Days Ampicillin- Sulbactam)”
Condition Keyword(s):
Intervention(s):
The aim of the study was to compare the activity (efficacy and safety) of Ertapenem administered according to a short treatment for three days versus a short treatment for three days with AS in patients with an community acquired IAI of mild to moderate severity.
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor), Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Study Primary Completion Date: March 2010
Detailed Clinical Trial Description
The study project is a prospective, randomized controlled investigation. The study will be performed in the Department of Transplant, General and Emergency Surgery of St Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital (Bologna, Italy), a large teaching institution, with the participation of all surgeons who accept to be involved in.
The study is designed and conducted in compliance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice regulations.
The tolerability and efficacy of a 3 days treatment with Ampicillin- Sulbactam (AS 3g x 3/ day i.v.) is compared a 3 days regimen with Ertapenem (1 g/day i.v.). in patients with localized peritonitis with a blinded evaluation of efficacy end points. Evaluation of cure or failure is blinded by use of designated third party individuals who are unaware of the treatment assigned to the patients.
Intervention(s) in this Clinical Trial
- Drug: Ertapenem
- 3 days regimen with Ertapenem (1 g/day i.v.)
- Drug: Ampicillin-Sulbactam
- 3 days treatment with Ampicillin-Sulbactam (AS 3g x 3/ day i.v.)
Arms, Groups and Cohorts in this Clinical Trial
- Experimental: E
- 3 days regimen with Ertapenem
- Active Comparator: AS
- 3 days treatment with Ampicillin-Sulbactam
Outcome Measures for this Clinical Trial
Primary Measures
- compare the failure rate of short therapy with Ertapenem and with AS in localized IAI
- Time Frame: 3 days
Safety Issue?: Yes
- Time Frame: 3 days
Secondary Measures
- any other complication
- Time Frame: intraoperatively, postoperatively, at discharge, at 7-days, 1-month, 6-months follow-up
Safety Issue?: Yes
- Time Frame: intraoperatively, postoperatively, at discharge, at 7-days, 1-month, 6-months follow-up
- The total costs of antibiotic therapy
- Time Frame: during hospital stay
Safety Issue?: No
- Time Frame: during hospital stay
Criteria for Participation in this Clinical Trial
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients (>18 years) requiring surgical intervention within 24 hours of diagnosis, for localized IAI infections (i.e extending beyond the organ wall but confined near the hollow viscus, mild to moderate in severity):
- Acute appendicitis: Ruptured or perforated with abscess
- Acute diverticulitis with perforation and/or abscess
- Acute cholecystitis (including gangrenous) with either rupture or perforation
- Acute gastric and duodenal (> 24 hours) perforation
- Traumatic (> 12 hours) perforation of the intestines
- Secondary peritonitis due to perforated viscus
- Intra-abdominal abscess (including of liver and spleen)
Exclusion Criteria:
- traumatic bowel perforation requiring surgery within 12 hours
- perforation of gastroduodenal ulcers requiring surgery within 24 hours
- other intra-abdominal processes in which the primary etiology was unlikely to be infectious.
- patients lactating or pregnant
- patients with a history of allergy, hypersensitivity, or any severe reaction to the study antibiotics
- patients with rapidly progressive or terminal illness;
- patients with a history or presence of severe hepatic or renal disease (e.g.
- creatinine clearance < 0.5 ml/min/1.73 m2);
- patients with a concomitant infection that would interfere with evaluation of response to the study antibiotics.
Gender Eligibility for this Clinical Trial: Both
Minimum Age for this Clinical Trial: 18 Years
Maximum Age for this Clinical Trial: N/A
Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted for this Clinical Trial?: No
Clinical Trial Sponsor Information
Lead Sponsor: University of Bologna
Overall Clinical Trial Officials and Contacts
Fausto Catena, MD PhD Study Director S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital - University of Bologna
Overall Contact: Fausto Catena, MD PhD +390516363235 fausto.catena@aosp.bo.it
Related Publications
References
Basoli A, Chirletti P, Cirino E, D'Ovidio NG, Doglietto GB, Giglio D, Giulini SM, Malizia A, Taffurelli M, Petrovic J, Ecari M; Italian Study Group. A prospective, double-blind, multicenter, randomized trial comparing ertapenem 3 vs >/=5 days in community-acquired intraabdominal infection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Mar;12(3):592-600. Epub 2007 Sep 11.
Additional Information
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on September 04, 2008
Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00630513
Study ID Number: T.E.A. Study
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00630513
Health Authority: Italy: Ethics Committee
Clinical Trials Authorship and Review
Clinical Trials content is provided directly by the U.S. National Institutes of Health via ClinicalTrials.gov and is not reviewed separately by ClinicalTrialsFeeds.org. Every page of specific clinical trials information contains a unique identifier which can be used to find further details directly from the National Institutes of Health.