This study looks at the healing rates in patients with Erosive Esophagitis (EE) when treated with either esomeprazole or...
Date First Received: March 18, 2008
Last Updated: March 21, 2008
Verified by: AstraZeneca, March 2008
Clinical Trial Phase: Phase 4 | Start Date: December 2002
Overall Status: Completed
Estimated Enrollment: 1000
Brief Summary
Official Title: “A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel-Group Efficacy Study Comparing 8 Weeks of Treatment With Esomeprazole Magnesium (40mg qd) to Lansoprazole (30mg qd) for the Healing of Erosive Esophagitis in Patients With Moderate or Severe Erosive Esophagitis.”
Condition Keyword(s):
Intervention(s):
This study looks at the healing rates in patients with Erosive Esophagitis (EE) when treated with either esomeprazole or lansoprazole
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Study Primary Completion Date: August 2003
Intervention(s) in this Clinical Trial
- Drug: Esomeprazole
- 40mg once daily
- Drug: Lansoprazole
- 30mg once daily
Arms, Groups and Cohorts in this Clinical Trial
- Experimental: 1
- Nexium
- Active Comparator: 2
- Prevacid
Outcome Measures for this Clinical Trial
Primary Measures
- To compare the difference in healing rates of erosive esophagitis (EE) between esomeprazole 40 mg qd (E40) and lansoprazole 30 mg qd (L30) in patients with moderate or severe EE, defined as Grade C or D in the Los Angeles (LA) Classification scale.
- Time Frame: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at baseline and then week 4 and week 8 (if not healed at week 4)
- Time Frame: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at baseline and then week 4 and week 8 (if not healed at week 4)
Secondary Measures
- 1. To compare the difference in the resolution of, and relief of, the investigator evaluated GERD symptoms of heartburn, acid regurgitation, dysphagia, and epigastric pain between E40 and L30 at week 4 of treatment in patients with moderate or severe EE.
- Time Frame: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at baseline and then week 4 and week 8 (if not healed at week 4)
- Time Frame: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at baseline and then week 4 and week 8 (if not healed at week 4)
- 1. To compare the difference between E40 and L30 in the occurrence of heartburn symptoms as reported in the patient's daily diary.
- Time Frame: Dairy card to be completed by patient daily
- Time Frame: Dairy card to be completed by patient daily
- To evaluate safety and tolerability of E40 compared to that of L30 in patients with moderate or severe EE.
- Time Frame: Adverse event collection on an ongoing basis
- Time Frame: Adverse event collection on an ongoing basis
Criteria for Participation in this Clinical Trial
Inclusion Criteria:
- Episodes of heartburn (described as a burning feeling, rising from the stomach or lower part of the chest up towards the neck) for 2 days or more during the last 7 days prior to baseline.
- Confirmed Erosive Esophagitis within 1 week prior to starting the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any signs of gastrointestinal bleeding at the time of the starting the study.
- Any previous gastric or esophageal surgery.
- Various gastrointestinal diseases as listed in the protocol.
Gender Eligibility for this Clinical Trial: Both
Minimum Age for this Clinical Trial: 18 Years
Maximum Age for this Clinical Trial: 75 Years
Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted for this Clinical Trial?: No
Clinical Trial Sponsor Information
Lead Sponsor: AstraZeneca
Overall Clinical Trial Officials and Contacts
Paula Fernstrom Study Director Nexium Global Product Director, AstraZeneca
Additional Information
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on September 05, 2008
Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00641602
Study ID Number: 322
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00641602
Health Authority: United States: Food and Drug Administration
Clinical Trials Authorship and Review
Clinical Trials content is provided directly by the U.S. National Institutes of Health via ClinicalTrials.gov and is not reviewed separately by ClinicalTrialsFeeds.org. Every page of specific clinical trials information contains a unique identifier which can be used to find further details directly from the National Institutes of Health.