The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of titrated oral misoprostol solution with intravenous oxytocin for labor augmentation in women without adequate uterine contractions...
Date First Received: June 8, 2008
Last Updated: July 8, 2008
Verified by: China Medical University Hospital, July 2008
Clinical Trial Phase: Phase 4 | Start Date: February 2008
Overall Status: Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment: 143
Brief Summary
Official Title: “A Comparison of Titrated Oral Misoprostol Solution to Intravenous Oxytocin for Labor Augmentation: A Randomized Controlled Trial”
Condition Keyword(s):
Intervention(s):
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of titrated oral misoprostol solution with intravenous oxytocin for labor augmentation in women without adequate uterine contractions.
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Single Blind (Subject), Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Study Primary Completion Date: December 2008
Detailed Clinical Trial Description
Numerous labor course necessitate augmentation when uterine contractions are inadequate. When the cervix is favorable, labor augmentation attempts are more likely to be successful.
Augmentation is these women is traditionally undertaken with intravenous oxytocin and amniotomy, either alone or in combination. In our previous trial, it has been proven that the method of titrated oral misoprostol is associated with a lower incidence of uterine hyperstimulation and a lower cesarean delivery rate than vaginal misoprostol for labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervix. Because administering Misoprostol solution is easy and cost saving, it is worth to develop this novel method in labor augmentation.
Intervention(s) in this Clinical Trial
- Drug: Misoprostol
- Titrated Misoprostol Solution
- Drug: Oxytocin
- Titrated Intravenous Oxytocin
Arms, Groups and Cohorts in this Clinical Trial
- Experimental: 1
- Titrated Oral Misoprostol Solution
- Active Comparator: 2
- Intravenous Oxytocin
Outcome Measures for this Clinical Trial
Primary Measures
- the percentage of women delivering infants vaginally within 12 hours of augmentation
- Time Frame: post vaginal delivery
Safety Issue?: No
- Time Frame: post vaginal delivery
Secondary Measures
- uterine hyperstimulation rate
- Time Frame: post vaginal delivery
Safety Issue?: Yes
- Time Frame: post vaginal delivery
Criteria for Participation in this Clinical Trial
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy between 36 and 42 weeks of gestation
- Live singleton
- Cephalic presentation
- A reassuring fetal heart rate pattern
- Bishop score greater than 6
- Inadequate uterine contraction (less than or equal to 2 per 10 minutes)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Nonreassuring fetal heart rate pattern
- Parity more than five
- Uterine scar
- Suspected placental abruption with abnormal fetal heart rate
- Vaginal bleeding other than "bloody show"
- Significant maternal cardiac, renal, or hepatic disease
- hypersensitivity to oxytocin, misoprostol or prostaglandin analogues
Gender Eligibility for this Clinical Trial: Female
Minimum Age for this Clinical Trial: 18 Years
Maximum Age for this Clinical Trial: 45 Years
Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted for this Clinical Trial?: No
Clinical Trial Sponsor Information
Lead Sponsor: China Medical University Hospital
Overall Clinical Trial Officials and Contacts
Shi-Yann Cheng, MD Study Chair China Medical University Beigang Hospital
Overall Contact: Ming Ho, MD 886-4-22062121 mi.ho@msa.hinet.net
Related Publications
References
Cheng SY, Ming H, Lee JC. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;111(1):119-25.
Additional Information
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on July 02, 2009
Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00695331
Study ID Number: CMUBH R96007
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00695331
Health Authority: Taiwan: Department of Health
Clinical Trials Authorship and Review
Clinical Trials content is provided directly by the U.S. National Institutes of Health via ClinicalTrials.gov and is not reviewed separately by ClinicalTrialsFeeds.org. Every page of specific clinical trials information contains a unique identifier which can be used to find further details directly from the National Institutes of Health.