Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher in rEducing Late Loss After stENTing

Objectives 1. To evaluate the safety and long-term effectiveness of coronary stenting with the Everolimus-eluting coronary stent system(EECSS) (XIENCETM V, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, PromusTM, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA), compared with the sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system(SECSS) (CypherTM, Cordis Johnson & Johnson, Warren, NJ) in the treatment of coronary stenosis. 2. To...

Date First Received: June 15, 2008

Last Updated: June 16, 2008

Verified by: Seoul National University Hospital, June 2008

Clinical Trial Phase: Phase 4 | Start Date: June 2008

Overall Status: Not yet recruiting

Estimated Enrollment: 1466

Brief Summary

Official Title: “Comparison of the Efficacy of Everolimus-Eluting Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent for Coronary Lesions”

Condition Keyword(s):

Objectives

1. To evaluate the safety and long-term effectiveness of coronary stenting with the Everolimus-eluting coronary stent system(EECSS) (XIENCETM V, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, PromusTM, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA), compared with the sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system(SECSS) (CypherTM, Cordis Johnson & Johnson, Warren, NJ) in the treatment of coronary stenosis.

2. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 6-month clopidogrel therapy compared with 12-month clopidogrel therapy.

Study Design: Prospective, open label, two-arm, randomized multi-center trial to test the non-inferiority of EECSS compared with the SECSS, and to test the non-inferiority of 6 months duration compared with 12 months duration of clopidogrel therapy. Patients will be randomized in a two by two factorial manner according to the type of drug eluting stent (EECSS vs.

SECSS) and the duration of dual anti-platelet therapy (6 months vs. 12 months). Randomization will also be stratified per hospital for the presence of DM and the presence of long lesions (lesion length ≥ 28mm)

Patient Enrollment: 1,372 patients enrolled at 17 centers in Korea.

Patient Follow-Up: Clinical follow-up will occur at 1, 3, and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years. Investigator or designee may conduct follow-up as telephone contacts or office visits.

Primary Endpoint - In-segment late luminal loss (LL) at 9 months for comparison of stenting with EECSS vs.

SECSS. - Target vessel failure (TVF) (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischemia driven target vessel revascularization) at 12 months for comparison of 6 months vs. 12 months of clopidogrel therapy

Secondary Endpoint - All Death - Cardiac death - Myocardial infarction - Target vessel revascularization (TVR) (all and ischemia-driven) - Target lesion revascularization (TLR) (all and ischemia-driven) - Stent thrombosis - Acute success (device, lesion, and procedure) - Bleeding - Cerebrovascular accident - In-stent LL at 9 months - Angiographic pattern of restenosis at 9-month angiographic follow-up - In-stent and in-segment % diameter stenosis (%DS) at 9 months - In-stent % volume obstruction (%VO) at 9 months - Incomplete stent apposition post index procedure - Persisting incomplete stent apposition, late-acquired incomplete stent apposition, aneurysm, thrombosis, and persisting dissection at 9 months

Study Type: Interventional

Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study

Study Primary Completion Date: June 2010

Intervention(s) in this Clinical Trial

  • Device: Everolimus-eluting stent (Xience or Promus)
    • Use everolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of coronary stenosis
  • Device: Sirolimus-eluting stent (Cypher)
    • Use sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of coronary stenosis
  • Drug: 6-month clopidogrel therapy
    • Use clopidogrel for 6 months
  • Drug: 12-month clopidogrel therapy
    • Use clopidogrel for 12 months

Arms, Groups and Cohorts in this Clinical Trial

  • Experimental: E6
    • Everolimus-eluting stent 6-month clopidogrel therapy
  • Active Comparator: S6
    • Sirolimus-eluting stent 6-month clopidogrel therapy
  • Experimental: E12
    • Everolimus-eluting stent 12-month clopidogrel therapy
  • Active Comparator: S12
    • Sirolimus-eluting stent 12-month clopidogrel therapy

Outcome Measures for this Clinical Trial

Primary Measures

  • In-segment late luminal loss (LL) at 9 months for comparison of stenting with EECSS vs. SECSS.
    • Time Frame: 9 months
      Safety Issue?: Yes
  • Target vessel failure (TVF) (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischemia driven target vessel revascularization) at 12 months for comparison of 6 months vs. 12 months of clopidogrel therapy
    • Time Frame: 12 months
      Safety Issue?: Yes

Secondary Measures

  • All death
    • Time Frame: 5 years
      Safety Issue?: Yes
  • Cardiac death
    • Time Frame: 5 Years
      Safety Issue?: Yes
  • Myocardial infarction
    • Time Frame: 5 years
      Safety Issue?: Yes
  • Target vessel revascularization (TVR) (all and ischemia-driven)
    • Time Frame: 5 years
      Safety Issue?: Yes
  • Target lesion revascularization (TLR) (all and ischemia-driven)
    • Time Frame: 5 years
      Safety Issue?: Yes
  • Stent thrombosis
    • Time Frame: 5 years
      Safety Issue?: Yes
  • Acute success (device, lesion, and procedure)
    • Time Frame: Index procedure
      Safety Issue?: Yes
  • Bleeding
    • Time Frame: 5 years
      Safety Issue?: Yes
  • Cerebrovascular accident
    • Time Frame: 5 years
      Safety Issue?: Yes
  • In-stent LL at 9 months
    • Time Frame: 9 months
      Safety Issue?: Yes
  • Angiographic pattern of restenosis at 9-month angiographic follow-up
    • Time Frame: 9 months
      Safety Issue?: Yes
  • In-stent and in-segment % diameter stenosis (%DS) at 9 months
    • Time Frame: 9 months
      Safety Issue?: Yes
  • In-stent % volume obstruction (%VO) at 9 months
    • Time Frame: 9 months
      Safety Issue?: Yes
  • Incomplete stent apposition post index procedure
    • Time Frame: Index procedure
      Safety Issue?: No
  • Persisting incomplete stent apposition, late-acquired incomplete stent apposition, aneurysm, thrombosis, and persisting dissection at 9 months
    • Time Frame: 9 months
      Safety Issue?: Yes

Criteria for Participation in this Clinical Trial

General Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Subject must be at least 18 years of age.
  • 2. Subject is able to verbally confirm understandings of risks, benefits and treatment alternatives of receiving the XIENCE V EECS and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides written informed consent prior to any study related procedure.
  • 3. Subject must have significant coronary artery stenosis (>50% by visual estimate)
  • 4. Subject must have evidence of myocardial ischemia (e.g., stable, unstable angina, recent infarction, silent ischemia, positive functional study or a reversible changes in the electrocardiogram (ECG) consistent with ischemia. In subjects with coronary artery stenosis > 75%, evidence of myocardial ischemia does not have to be documented.
  • 5. Subjects must be an acceptable candidate for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) surgery.
  • Angiographically

Inclusion Criteria

  • 1. Target lesion(s) must be located in a native coronary artery with visually estimated diameter of ≥ 2.25 mm and ≤ 4.25 mm.
  • 2. Target lesion(s) must be amenable for percutaneous coronary intervention

General Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. The patient has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications (heparin, aspirin, clopidogrel, sirolimus, everolimus, Contrast media
  • 2. Systemic (intravenous) Sirolimus, everolimus use within 12 months.
  • 3. Female of childbearing potential, unless a recent pregnancy test is negative, who possibly plan to become pregnant any time after enrollment into this study.
  • 4. History of bleeding diathesis or known coagulopathy (including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia), or will refuse blood transfusions.
  • 5. Gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding within the prior 3 months, or major surgery within 2 months.
  • 6. Current known current platelet count <100,000 cells/mm3 or Hgb <10 g/dL.
  • 7. An elective surgical procedure is planned that would necessitate interruption of clopidogrel during the first 12 months post enrollment.
  • 8. Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy <1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment).
  • 9. Patients who are actively participating in another drug or device investigational study, which have not completed the primary endpoint follow-up period.
  • 10. Patients who have received any stent implantation in the target vessel prior to enrollment.
  • 11. Patients with LVEF<25% or those with cardiogenic shock
  • 12. Patients with myocardial infarction within 72 hours
  • 13. Creatinine level ≥ 3.0mg/dL or dependence on dialysis.
  • 14. Severe hepatic dysfunction (AST and ALT: 3 times upper normal reference values).
  • Angiographic

Exclusion Criteria

  • 1. Patients with significant left main coronary artery stenosis
  • 2. Patients who's target lesion has in-stent restenosis at the stented segment of drug-eluting stents or bare metal stents
  • 3. Target lesions with chronic total occlusion
  • 4. True bifurcation lesions requiring two stents

Gender Eligibility for this Clinical Trial: Both

Minimum Age for this Clinical Trial: 18 Years

Maximum Age for this Clinical Trial: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted for this Clinical Trial?: No

Clinical Trial Sponsor Information

Lead Sponsor: Seoul National University Hospital

Overall Clinical Trial Officials and Contacts

Hyo-Soo Kim, MD, PhD Study Chair Seoul National University Hospital  

Overall Contact: Kyung-Woo Park, MD, PhD 82-2-2072-0244 kwparkmd@snu.ac.kr

Additional Information

Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on August 29, 2008

Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00698607

Study ID Number: EXCELLENT

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00698607

Health Authority: South Korea: Institutional Review Board

Clinical Trials Authorship and Review

Clinical Trials content is provided directly by the U.S. National Institutes of Health via ClinicalTrials.gov and is not reviewed separately by ClinicalTrialsFeeds.org. Every page of specific clinical trials information contains a unique identifier which can be used to find further details directly from the National Institutes of Health.