Antibiotic therapy has been shown to be beneficial in patients with severe acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although recent guidelines support the use of new antibiotics there is no evidence that newer antibiotics are any better than older agents. The choice of antibiotic to be used in this situation is challenging to the clinician who must choose between...
Date First Received: November 12, 2008
Last Updated: November 13, 2008
Verified by: University of Monastir, November 2008
Clinical Trial Phase: Phase 3 | Start Date: July 2002
Overall Status: Completed
Estimated Enrollment: 170
Brief Summary
Official Title: “Antibiotic Comparison Exacerbation COPD”
Condition Keyword(s):
Intervention(s):
Antibiotic therapy has been shown to be beneficial in patients with severe acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although recent guidelines support the use of new antibiotics there is no evidence that newer antibiotics are any better than older agents. The choice of antibiotic to be used in this situation is challenging to the clinician who must choose between traditional antibiotics (cyclins, aminopénicillins, cotrimoxazole...) and new antimicrobial agents. Indeed, available comparative studies did not show an obvious superiority of new antibiotics compared to their predecessors . Taking into account bacterial agents associated to COPD exacerbations, one must choose an antibiotic which has the best activity against Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Branhamella catarrhalis. News quinolones are represented as an interesting alternative to standard antibiotics because of their large spectrum of action and of their pharmacokinetic advantages allowing high tissue penetration in the pulmonary parenchyma and tracheobronchial tree. Data on their use among patients having moderate exacerbation of COPD are encouraging but their effectiveness in more severe presentations is not established. The objective of this randomized controlled and double blind study is to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerance of ciprofloxacin compared to trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole in patients admitted to ICU for severe exacerbation of COPD requiring mechanical ventilation.
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Study Primary Completion Date: June 2005
Intervention(s) in this Clinical Trial
- Drug: ciprofloxacin
- 1500 mg a day for 10 days
- Drug: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
- 2000 mg a day for 10 days
Arms, Groups and Cohorts in this Clinical Trial
- Active Comparator: Ciprofloxacin
- 750 mg a day during 10 days
- Active Comparator: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
- 2000 mg a day for 10 days
Outcome Measures for this Clinical Trial
Primary Measures
- Two major criteria will be used for the determination of sample size and the estimate of the effectiveness of the treatments of the study:
1. mortality (in ICU and in the hospital)
2. rate of additional antibiotherapy course.
- Time Frame: 30 day after starting protocol
Safety Issue?: No
- Time Frame: 30 day after starting protocol
Secondary Measures
- Mechanical ventilation duration
- Time Frame: 30 days after starting protocol
Safety Issue?: No
- Time Frame: 30 days after starting protocol
- Duration of hospital stay
- Time Frame: 30 days after starting protocol
Safety Issue?: No
- Time Frame: 30 days after starting protocol
Criteria for Participation in this Clinical Trial
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients having a COPD (according to the definition of the American Thoracic
- Society) and having an acute exacerbation leading to an acute respiratory failure requiring the admission to ICU and mechanical ventilation.
- The acute exacerbation of COPD is defined by increase in the frequency of cough, the volume and the purulence of expectoration and increase of baseline dyspnea. To be included, patients must have respiratory rate >30 cycles/min and one of the following blood gas criteria (with blood gases performed right before the initiation of mechanical ventilation): PaC02 > 6kPa and arterial pH <7.30.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pneumonia documented with chest radiography
- Antibiotic treatment in the ten previous days of ICU admission
- Former inclusion in the study
- History of allergy to the quinolones and/or to trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole
- Pregnancy or breast feeding
- Severe chronic disease: heart, liver, kidney.
- Known immunodeficiency (malignant hemopathy, AIDS...)
- Digestive disease which could affect the absorption of the drugs
- Concomitant infection which requires systemic antibiotic treatment
Gender Eligibility for this Clinical Trial: Both
Minimum Age for this Clinical Trial: 18 Years
Maximum Age for this Clinical Trial: N/A
Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted for this Clinical Trial?: No
Clinical Trial Sponsor Information
Lead Sponsor: University of Monastir
Overall Clinical Trial Officials and Contacts
nouira semir, MD Principal Investigator research unit 04/UR/08-20
Additional Information
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on July 02, 2009
Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00791505
Study ID Number: 04/UR/08-20
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00791505
Health Authority: Tunisia: Office of Pharmacies and Medicines
Clinical Trials Authorship and Review
Clinical Trials content is provided directly by the U.S. National Institutes of Health via ClinicalTrials.gov and is not reviewed separately by ClinicalTrialsFeeds.org. Every page of specific clinical trials information contains a unique identifier which can be used to find further details directly from the National Institutes of Health.